Mailchimp vs Brevo
Compare audience and send-based pricing carefully.
THE SHORT ANSWER
Choose around your workflow.
Compare Mailchimp and Brevo using both your contact count and monthly send volume. Check the plan that includes your welcome journey, segmentation and required channels. Free allowances can be useful for a trial, but are a poor substitute for modelling the cost of a growing list.
Sources checked 13 October 2026| What to compare | Mailchimp | Brevo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Email Marketing | Email Marketing |
| Best-fit starting point | Businesses planning regular email campaigns and wanting a path to more sophisticated customer journeys. | Businesses wanting marketing and transactional email within one platform. |
| Free plan | Yes, with limits. Current Free plan: 250 counted contacts, 500 sends/month and 250 sends/day; one seat and one audience. | Yes, with limits. Free: 100,000 stored contacts and 300 daily sends; automation covers up to 2,000 contacts. Large campaigns need manual requeuing. |
| Pricing considerations | Free tier and paid plans that scale with audience size and email volume. Trial and promotional figures differ from continuing subscription costs. | Free tier plus paid plans priced by email-volume tier, with corresponding contact limits. Additional channels, seats and selected features use add-ons. |
| Capabilities to check |
|
|
| Buying considerations |
|
|
| Official sources | ||
| Next step | Visit Mailchimp ↗ | Visit Brevo ↗ |
Check the plan against your sending calendar
Contact storage and daily or monthly sends can trigger different upgrade needs.
Use the email capacity planner and GBP price guide →Test the same work in both tools
- Build and preview a mobile-friendly email.
- Create a welcome sequence for a test segment.
- Calculate a typical and peak-month bill.
How this comparison was researched
The official sources above cover the products’ capabilities and plan options. Features may require a particular paid tier; confirm the plan and region with the vendor.
Read the full methodology →