Zapier vs Make
Connected app workflows or a visual scenario builder?
THE SHORT ANSWER
Choose around your workflow.
Try Zapier for a direct app-to-app workflow and Make when visual branching and data mapping are central to your process. Neither is a universal winner. Check the exact app actions and calculate usage with real executions, especially where loops and retries are involved.
Sources checked 13 October 2026| What to compare | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow Automation | Workflow Automation |
| Best-fit starting point | Teams connecting familiar business apps and automating repeatable hand-offs. | Teams that want to inspect data flows and branching logic in a visual workflow. |
| Free plan | Yes, with limits. Free forever with 100 tasks per month and two-step workflows. | Yes, with limits. Free plan includes 1,000 monthly credits; check current scheduling and capacity limits. |
| Pricing considerations | Free plan and paid subscriptions based on package and task tier. Team administration, add-ons and additional usage affect cost. | Free and paid credit-based subscriptions. Credit usage depends on scenario actions and selected AI features; verify current packaging on the live pricing page. |
| Capabilities to check |
|
|
| Buying considerations |
|
|
| Official sources | ||
| Next step | Visit Zapier ↗ | Visit Make ↗ |
Test the same work in both tools
- Build the same workflow on both platforms.
- Trigger it with missing data and a duplicate event.
- Inspect the execution history and calculate usage.
How this comparison was researched
The official sources above cover the products’ capabilities and plan options. Features may require a particular paid tier; confirm the plan and region with the vendor.
Read the full methodology →